Model comparison
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo vs Qwen Plus
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo scores higher in 7 categories and Qwen Plus in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads 45.5 to 22.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 83.1% for Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and 17.8% for Qwen Plus.
- Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 45.4 | 36.7 |
| Released | 2025-11-06 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 38.1 (#166), Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1328 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1322 | — |
Reasoning Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 31.4 (#72), Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1428 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 20% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 45.5 (#62), Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 83.1% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1429 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 50.9 (#64), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 84.2% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1439 | 1328 |
Multilingual Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 51.6 (#104), Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1398 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1457 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1356 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1390 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1425 | — |
| LMArena German | 1390 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1329 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1407 | — |
Instruction Following Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 74.2 (#103), Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1403 | 1303 |
Long Context Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 43.2 (#99), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1415 | 1325 |
Writing & Preference Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo leads
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo: 60.2 (#99), Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1415 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1373 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1414 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo better than Qwen Plus?
Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.4 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo or Qwen Plus better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 38.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo and Qwen Plus share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.