Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 23.3.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1314 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1299 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1314 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1271 |
| LMArena German | — | 1231 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1275 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1324 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (38.9 vs 38.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.