Model comparison

GPT-4.5 vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

GPT-4.5 OpenAI

37.2

Rank #208 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. GPT-4.5 scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 25.9 to 13.9.

Side by side

GPT-4.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 specifications
GPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index37.238.8
Released2025-02-27—
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked4214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 42.2 (#109), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Coding13961314
Aider Polyglot44.9%—
WeirdML39.4%—
LiveBench Coding75.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 27.9 (#97), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Cybench17.5%—

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4.5: 13.9 (#330), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Hard Prompts14031299
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench34.5%—
ARC-AGI-110.3%—
EnigmaEval3.2%—
LiveBench Reasoning71.1%—
LiveBench Data Analysis64.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index136.74—
ForecastBench61.7—
LiveBench69%—

Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.6 (#211), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Math14121298
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202537.8%—
LiveBench Math69.3%—
MATH Level 578.6%—

Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

GPT-4.5: 32.5 (#211), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Expert13941289
GPQA Diamond68.7%—
Humanity's Last Exam5.4%—
Confabulations13.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

GPT-4.5: 37.6 (#71), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Vision1195—
VPCT45%—

Multilingual GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 52.5 (#83), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Non-English14131265
LMArena Chinese14211314
LMArena German14571231
LMArena Japanese14161207
LMArena Russian14191271
LMArena French1418—
LMArena Korean1392—

Instruction Following GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 72.6 (#134), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Instruction Following14041275
LiveBench Instruction Following72.3%—

Long Context GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 40.4 (#155), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Longer Query14061292
Fiction.LiveBench63.9%—

Writing & Preference GPT-4.5 leads

GPT-4.5: 56.9 (#134), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGPT-4.5Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
LMArena Text14171299
LMArena Creative Writing13941262
LMArena Multi-Turn14441299
Short-Story Creative Writing75.6%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1258—
LiveBench Language61.5%—

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4.5 better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 37.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is GPT-4.5 or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?

GPT-4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.2 versus 38.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do GPT-4.5 and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. GPT-4.5 has 42 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper