Model comparison
Qwen Max vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 7 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 22.3.
Side by side
| Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1314 |
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1299 |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1265 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1314 |
| LMArena German | 1254 | 1231 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | 1207 |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | 1271 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1292 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1299 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Max better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 34.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Max or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 30.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.