Model comparison

Qwen-7B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen-7B and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Qwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—51.4
Released2023-09-282026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked833

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
Epoch Capabilities Index106.47153.74
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
BIG-Bench Hard45%—
LAMBADA67.9%—
PIQA77.9%—

Math Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1488
GSM8K51.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488
ARC (AI2) Challenge75.3%—
BoolQ76.4%—
MMLU45%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1475
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena Russian—1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen-7B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen-7BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1450
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen-7B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Qwen-7B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen-7B has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper