Model comparison
GPT-5.2 Pro vs Qwen-7B
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
- Qwen-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 52.2 | — |
| Released | 2025-12-11 | 2023-09-28 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 400K | — |
| Max output | 128K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $21 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $168 | — |
| Results tracked | 8 | 8 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Reasoning Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 51.8 (#31), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 155.41 | 106.47 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 54.2% | — |
| SimpleBench | 57.4% | — |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 79.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 90.5% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 45% |
| LAMBADA | — | 67.9% |
| PIQA | — | 77.9% |
Math Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: 64.8 (#23), Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | 74% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | 46% | — |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 31.3% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 51.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GPT-5.2 Pro: —, Qwen-7B: —
| Benchmark | GPT-5.2 Pro | Qwen-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 76.4% |
| MMLU | — | 45% |
Frequently asked questions
Is GPT-5.2 Pro better than Qwen-7B?
GPT-5.2 Pro has enough public results to be ranked (#34); Qwen-7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do GPT-5.2 Pro and Qwen-7B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. GPT-5.2 Pro has 8 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-7B has 8.