Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen-14B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 4 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen-14B leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1035 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1018 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1017 |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1023 |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1048 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen-14B and Wizardlm 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (31.4 vs 31.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen-14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.2 versus 30.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.