Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.7 Flash in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 28.2 to 19.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 39.9 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | 144.64 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.