Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 31.2 to 16.3.
Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1068 | — |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.