Model comparison
Qwen-14B vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen-14B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 27.6.
- Qwen-14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.4 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2023-09-24 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#288), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1071 | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 19.6 (#257), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1027 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 55% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 113.03 | — |
| LAMBADA | 71.1% | — |
| PIQA | 79.9% | — |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Qwen-14B: 31.2 (#227), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1068 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 61.3% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen-14B: —, Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.4% | — |
| BoolQ | 86.2% | — |
| MMLU | 66.3% | — |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 27.5 (#275), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1041 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1077 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 52.4 (#289), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1031 | 1303 |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#280), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1028 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Qwen-14B: 27.6 (#299), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen-14B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1051 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1028 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1022 | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen-14B better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen-14B or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen-14B and Qwen Plus share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen-14B has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.