Model comparison
Gemma 3 12B vs Qwen2.5 Plus 1127
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 12B scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 36.1 to 22.3.
- Gemma 3 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.1 | 38.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.05 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.15 | — |
| Results tracked | 24 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 31.7 (#280), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1281 | 1314 |
| SciCode | 17.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: 25.5 (#108), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 30.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 15.7 (#313), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1309 | 1299 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 48.8% | — |
| LMCA | 4.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.5 | — |
Math Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 22.3 (#279), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1307 | 1298 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 26.5 (#257), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | 1289 |
| GPQA Diamond | 39.5% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 4.4% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 12B: —, Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| MindCube | 46.7% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 45.7 (#165), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1318 | 1265 |
| LMArena German | 1370 | 1231 |
| LMArena Russian | 1335 | 1271 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1207 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 12B leads
Gemma 3 12B: 68.6 (#186), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1299 | 1275 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3 12B: 40.0 (#162), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1317 | 1292 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads
Gemma 3 12B: 47.5 (#209), Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 12B | Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1334 | 1299 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1331 | 1262 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1334 | 1299 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1126 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 12B better than Qwen2.5 Plus 1127?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 32.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 12B or Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better for coding?
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.5 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 12B and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 12B has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14.