Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

39.2

Rank #171 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 36.3 to 26.3.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMistral AIStepFun
Noometry Index31.239.2
Released2025-06-20—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window256K—
Max output16K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938—
Output $ / M tokens$0.25—
Results tracked612

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 38.5 (#174)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding—1316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 25.9 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1299
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74—

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 36.3 (#169)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LMArena Math—1304

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 35.2 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
LMArena Expert—1279

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.7 (#181)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English—1290
LMArena Chinese—1331
LMArena Russian—1324

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 67.9 (#192)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following—1287

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#170)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query—1307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.3 (#173)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Step 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text—1321
LMArena Creative Writing—1328
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1292

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper