Model comparison
Phi-4 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-4 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 40.5.
- Phi-4 is cheaper at $0.07 / $0.14 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B.
- Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
Side by side
| Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.2 | 43.2 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | 131K |
| Max output | 4K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.07 | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.14 | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 37 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 34.4 (#239), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1231 | 1439 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 45.5% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 30.7% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 55.4% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi-4: 22.8 (#128), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 28.8% | — |
| BALROG | 11.6% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 17.7 (#291), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1220 | 1428 |
| Chess Puzzles | 1% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 47.8% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 45.2% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.42 | — |
| LiveBench | 41.6% | — |
Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 20.8 (#285), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1246 | 1426 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 13.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 42% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 64.9% | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 32.6 (#209), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1203 | 1442 |
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| Confabulations | 29.4% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 3.7% | — |
| MMLU | 84.8% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Phi-4: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 37.2 (#237), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1197 | 1405 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1212 | 1463 |
| LMArena French | 1224 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1222 | 1424 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1158 | 1385 |
| LMArena Korean | 1151 | 1394 |
| LMArena Russian | 1209 | 1408 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1234 | 1428 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 60.4 (#251), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1201 | 1406 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.4% | — |
Long Context Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 36.9 (#226), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1217 | 1420 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads
Phi-4: 40.5 (#244), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 | Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1217 | 1420 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1182 | 1366 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1206 | 1428 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 62.6% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 25.6% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 costs 14× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Phi-4 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?
Phi-4 is cheaper. It lists at $0.07 per million input tokens and $0.14 per million output tokens; Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.
Is Phi-4 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B better for coding?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 34.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 has 37 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.