Model comparison

Mistral Small 3.2 vs Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 9.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Mistral Small 3.2 Mistral AI

31.2

Rank #280 Confirmed

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #95 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads 60.2 to 45.0.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper at $0.0938 / $0.25 per million input/output tokens, against $0.70 / $2.80 for Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B.
  • Mistral Small 3.2 accepts more context: 256K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B specifications
Mistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.243.2
Released2025-06-202025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window256K131K
Max output16K33K
Input $ / M tokens$0.0938$0.70
Output $ / M tokens$0.25$2.80
Results tracked618

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 42.4 (#100)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding—1439

Reasoning Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 18.1 (#287), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 29.3 (#92)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
Chess Puzzles1%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1428
Epoch Capabilities Index131.74—

Math Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.3 (#260), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.0 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202530.3%—
LMArena Math—1426

Knowledge Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 26.7 (#256), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 40.3 (#121)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
GPQA Diamond49.1%—
LMArena Expert—1442

Multimodal Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 39.8 (#55)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Vision—1247

Multilingual Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 51.9 (#97)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English—1405
LMArena Chinese—1463
LMArena French—1452
LMArena German—1424
LMArena Japanese—1385
LMArena Korean—1394
LMArena Russian—1408
LMArena Spanish—1428

Instruction Following Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 74.2 (#101)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following—1406

Long Context Not comparable

Mistral Small 3.2: —, Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 43.4 (#98)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query—1420

Writing & Preference Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B leads

Mistral Small 3.2: 45.0 (#224), Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B: 60.2 (#99)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkMistral Small 3.2Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B
LMArena Text—1420
LMArena Creative Writing—1366
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1255—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1428

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral Small 3.2 better than Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.2 to 31.2 on the Noometry Index. Mistral Small 3.2 costs 9.2× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

Which is cheaper, Mistral Small 3.2 or Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B?

Mistral Small 3.2 is cheaper. It lists at $0.0938 per million input tokens and $0.25 per million output tokens; Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B lists at $0.70 and $2.80.

Which has the bigger context window?

Mistral Small 3.2 does, with 256K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Mistral Small 3.2 and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Mistral Small 3.2 has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-VL 235B-A22B has 18.

Related comparisons

Go deeper