Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 38.6 to 27.6.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 30.4 | 39.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | — |
| Results tracked | 3 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 27.6 (#312), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 38.6 (#158)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1339 |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 21.7 (#190), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 25.7 (#127)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1336 |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 33.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Phi-4 Mini: 24.8 (#261), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.5 (#174)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 35.4 (#75)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.5 (#168)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1380 |
| LMArena German | — | 1315 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1327 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.4 (#171)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1311 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.1 (#141)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1350 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.4 (#154)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1308 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1341 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 30.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 27.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.