Model comparison
Phi-4 Mini vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen Plus leads 38.9 to 28.1.
- Phi-4 Mini is cheaper at $0.075 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $0.40 / $1.20 for Qwen Plus.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
- Phi-4 Mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.9 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-11 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 128K | 1M |
| Max output | 4K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.075 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.30 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Phi-4 Mini: 28.1 (#317), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 10.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1328 |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Phi-4 Mini: 22.4 (#195), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1317 |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
Math Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Qwen Plus leads
Phi-4 Mini: 25.3 (#262), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.5% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1303 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-4 Mini: —, Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Phi-4 Mini | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1336 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-4 Mini better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 30.9 on the Noometry Index. Phi-4 Mini costs 4.6× less per token, which makes it the better buy when Qwen Plus's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Phi-4 Mini or Qwen Plus?
Phi-4 Mini is cheaper. It lists at $0.075 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Qwen Plus lists at $0.40 and $1.20.
Is Phi-4 Mini or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Phi-4 Mini and Qwen Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-4 Mini has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.