Model comparison
Amazon Nova Pro vs Qwen Plus
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Amazon Nova Pro scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen Plus leads 28.4 to 20.0.
- Qwen Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $1.20 per million input/output tokens, against $0.80 / $3.20 for Amazon Nova Pro.
- Qwen Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 300K.
Side by side
| Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.0 | 37.1 |
| Released | 2024-12-03 | 2024-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 300K | 1M |
| Max output | 10K | 33K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.80 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $3.20 | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 38 | 20 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 35.1 (#229), Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1270 | 1328 |
| LiveBench Coding | 38.1% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 16.7 (#147), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 25% | — |
| TheAgentCompany | 1.7% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 20.0 (#243), Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1246 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 32.6% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 48.3% | — |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 123.8 | — |
| LiveBench | 43.5% | — |
Math Amazon Nova Pro leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 28.5 (#243), Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1252 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| Omni-MATH | 24.2% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 38% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
Knowledge Too close to call
Amazon Nova Pro: 27.4 (#250), Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1211 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 4.4% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | 67.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 30.1% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.1% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 44.6% | — |
| MMLU | 82% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Amazon Nova Pro: 25.0 (#126), Qwen Plus: —
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 980 | — |
Multilingual Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 39.7 (#223), Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1234 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1244 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1200 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1240 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1271 | — |
| LMArena German | 1243 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1203 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1182 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 64.9 (#226), Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1235 | 1303 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 67.1% | — |
| IFEval | 81.5% | — |
Long Context Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 38.1 (#205), Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1255 | 1324 |
Writing & Preference Qwen Plus leads
Amazon Nova Pro: 43.9 (#226), Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Amazon Nova Pro | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1259 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1212 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1246 | 1336 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 60.5% | — |
| WildBench | 77.7% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 37% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Amazon Nova Pro better than Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 31.0 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen Plus?
Qwen Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens; Amazon Nova Pro lists at $0.80 and $3.20.
Is Amazon Nova Pro or Qwen Plus better for coding?
Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen Plus does, with 1M tokens against 300K.
How many benchmarks do Amazon Nova Pro and Qwen Plus share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Amazon Nova Pro has 38 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.