Model comparison
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-32B
Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 1 category and Qwen1.5-32B in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 29.1 to 13.5.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.3 | 30.5 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 32 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1101 | 1155 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.3% |
| LiveBench Coding | 20.3% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 42% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen1.5-32B: 21.8 (#212)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1100 | 1130 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 15.9% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 30.3% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 58.1% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 79.1% | — |
| HellaSwag | 77% | — |
| LiveBench | 24% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen1.5-32B: 33.0 (#207)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1151 | 1155 |
| LiveBench Math | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#296)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1067 | 1126 |
| MMLU | 75.7% | 74.4% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 30.7% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 90.7% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 58.1% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen1.5-32B: 31.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1106 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1061 | 1177 |
| LMArena French | 1135 | 1101 |
| LMArena German | 1080 | 1058 |
| LMArena Japanese | 966 | 1027 |
| LMArena Korean | 894 | 1008 |
| LMArena Russian | 1111 | 1073 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1111 | 1089 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen1.5-32B: 57.7 (#265)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1087 | 1116 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 47.2% | — |
Long Context Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#246)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1088 | 1146 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-32B leads
Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen1.5-32B: 34.2 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct | Qwen1.5-32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1110 | 1137 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | 1083 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1068 | 1140 |
| LiveBench Language | 12.9% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-32B?
Qwen1.5-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.5 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-32B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.7 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-32B share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-32B has 21.