Noometry

Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-14B

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-14B Alibaba (Qwen)

32.7

Rank #253 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 8 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 21.4 to 14.8.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.332.7
Released2024-04-232024-02-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Coding11011138
LiveBench Coding20.3%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Hard Prompts11001113
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Math11511125
LiveBench Math17.6%—

Knowledge Too close to call

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Expert10671094
MMLU75.7%68.6%
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Non-English10581095
LMArena Chinese10611147
LMArena French11351116
LMArena German10801043
LMArena Japanese9661019
LMArena Russian11111046
LMArena Spanish11111085
LMArena Korean894—

Instruction Following Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Instruction Following10871102
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—

Long Context Too close to call

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Longer Query10881113

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-14B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-14B
LMArena Text11101128
LMArena Creative Writing10831091
LMArena Multi-Turn10681110
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-14B?

Qwen1.5-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.7 to 29.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-14B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper