Noometry

Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen1.5-110B

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Qwen1.5-110B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.6

Rank #231 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in instruction following, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 60.6 to 52.2.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.833.6
Released2024-04-232024-04-25
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3220

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313), Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Coding11021184
BigCodeBench Instruct—35%
LiveBench Coding20.3%—
BigCodeBench Complete—44.4%

Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319), Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Hard Prompts11001168
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
ForecastBench—57.7
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247), Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Math11511185
LiveBench Math17.6%—

Knowledge Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237), Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Expert10671144
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267), Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Non-English10581142
LMArena Chinese10611206
LMArena French11341150
LMArena German10801123
LMArena Japanese9661074
LMArena Korean8941044
LMArena Russian11111118
LMArena Spanish11111141

Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287), Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Instruction Following10871158
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—

Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262), Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Longer Query10881157

Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279), Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250)

BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen1.5-110B
LMArena Text11101175
LMArena Creative Writing10831148
LMArena Multi-Turn10681160
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 27.4 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen1.5-110B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.

Related comparisons

Go deeper