Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3 8B

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 8B in 5 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3 8B leads 34.9 to 26.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and 5% for Qwen3 8B.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.933.7
Released2024-04-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked3511

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
SciCode—22.6%
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%

Reasoning Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
Chess Puzzles0%5%
CritPt—0%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
DTBench—59.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
LMCA—8.8%
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—136.17
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—56.1%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond—56.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Qwen3 8B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.7 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3 8B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper