Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.8

Rank #236 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 28.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and 12% for Qwen3.5-9B.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.933.8
Released2024-04-232026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked3510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.9 (#217)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
SciCode—27.5%
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.5 (#151)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen3.5-9B: 23.1 (#182)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
Chess Puzzles0%12%
CritPt—0.3%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
DTBench—71.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
LMCA—24.5%
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.46
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen3.5-9B: 34.8 (#192)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#84)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 26.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper