Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3-4B

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-4B leads 19.2 to 14.1.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3-4B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.931.9
Released2024-04-232025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked356

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles0%4%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen3-4B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—52.2%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond—52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—5.7%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3-4B?

Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3-4B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper