Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3-4B
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 5 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 5 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-4B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-4B leads 33.0 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 7.5% for Gemma 3 4B and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 31.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | 35.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 4% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 52.2% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 38.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 52.3% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | 5.7% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Qwen3-4B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-4B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3-4B?
Qwen3-4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3-4B share?
5 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.