Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3-1.7B

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.9

Rank #328 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3-1.7B in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads 26.6 to 16.3.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.926.6
Released2024-04-232025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked354

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#323), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—28.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 14.1 (#328), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.6 (#257), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 28.5 (#246), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond—38%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.3 (#280), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1076—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1085—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 47.7 (#303), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#276), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.6 (#300), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.9 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3-1.7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper