Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3-1.7B
Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-1.7B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-1.7B leads 19.6 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | 28.4% |
Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 8.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3-1.7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 38% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | — |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3-1.7B share?
4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.