Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Qwen3-1.7B

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Qwen3-1.7B Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-1.7B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-1.7B leads 19.6 to 11.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 38% for Qwen3-1.7B.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3-1.7B specifications
Gemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.126.6
Released2025-03-122025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked224

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Coding1230—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3-1.7B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%28.4%

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
Chess Puzzles0%0%
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1253—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Too close to call

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%8.1%
LMArena Math1239—

Knowledge Qwen3-1.7B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
GPQA Diamond23.2%38%
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Non-English1273—
LMArena German1281—
LMArena Russian1294—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Instruction Following1239—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Longer Query1273—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Qwen3-1.7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BQwen3-1.7B
LMArena Text1291—
LMArena Creative Writing1271—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—
LMArena Multi-Turn1255—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Qwen3-1.7B?

Gemma 3 4B is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.1 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Qwen3-1.7B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.

Related comparisons

Go deeper