Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 2 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 5 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.5 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 19 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | 1018 |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | — |
Multilingual Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | 1048 |
Long Context Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 13b leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.