Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 43.0 to 30.7.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
Reasoning Wizardlm 13b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |
Long Context Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 29.6 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.