Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen3.5 35B-A3B

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct Microsoft

29.1

Rank #303 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

41.7

Rank #118 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads 58.1 to 27.3.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.141.7
Released2024-04-232026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.25
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1928

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.3 (#307), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 33.5 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Coding10401410
LMArena WebDev—1254
SciCode—29.3%
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 18.7 (#254), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 23.9 (#158)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts10281400
CritPt—0.6%
Chess Puzzles—10%
DTBench—80%
LMCA—29.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 29.2 (#220), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 38.4 (#86)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Math10891404
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—56%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70%

Knowledge Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.3 (#251), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 47.7 (#73)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Expert9841408
GPQA Diamond—83.5%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—10.5%

Multilingual Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.4 (#280), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 50.2 (#122)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Non-English10001379
LMArena Chinese10161458
LMArena French10381412
LMArena German10061367
LMArena Japanese8991326
LMArena Korean8561354
LMArena Russian10041377
LMArena Spanish10581390

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 52.1 (#289), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 73.0 (#123)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following10231379

Long Context Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.3 (#284), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 42.4 (#122)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query9961390

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 35B-A3B leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.3 (#296), Qwen3.5 35B-A3B: 58.1 (#118)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3.5 35B-A3B
LMArena Text10501395
LMArena Creative Writing10241347
LMArena Multi-Turn9891391

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen3.5 35B-A3B?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.7 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen3.5 35B-A3B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 35B-A3B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.5 versus 28.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 35B-A3B has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper