Model comparison

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Step 2 16k Exp 202412

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct Microsoft

32.4

Rank #246 Confirmed

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 StepFun

38.6

Rank #173 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads 52.5 to 34.3.
  • Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 specifications
Phi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
ProviderMicrosoftStepFun
Noometry Index32.438.6
Released——
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1712

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 37.9 (#170)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Coding11301316

Reasoning Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 24.8 (#140)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Hard Prompts11271299

Math Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 33.6 (#171)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Math11731305

Knowledge Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 34.6 (#187)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Expert11081279

Multilingual Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 43.9 (#176)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Non-English10941290
LMArena Chinese11081331
LMArena Russian11451324
LMArena French1109—
LMArena German1101—
LMArena Japanese1042—
LMArena Korean954—
LMArena Spanish1095—

Instruction Following Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 68.1 (#187)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Instruction Following11141287

Long Context Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 39.7 (#165)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Longer Query11201307

Writing & Preference Step 2 16k Exp 202412 leads

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267), Step 2 16k Exp 202412: 52.5 (#168)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Medium 4k InstructStep 2 16k Exp 202412
LMArena Text11381321
LMArena Creative Writing11061328
LMArena Multi-Turn10881292

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Step 2 16k Exp 202412?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Step 2 16k Exp 202412 better for coding?

Step 2 16k Exp 202412 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Step 2 16k Exp 202412 has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper