Model comparison
Gemma 2 2b IT vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 32.5 | 29.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1112 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.4 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.0 (#228)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1135 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1096 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 32.9 (#92)
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1121 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |
| LMArena French | 1156 | — |
| LMArena German | 1114 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1055 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1140 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1118 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1130 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 2 2b IT | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1156 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1147 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1118 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 2 2b IT better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.5 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 2 2b IT and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 2 2b IT has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.