Model comparison
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.9 to 11.8.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.4 | 28.6 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.17 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Results tracked | 17 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1130 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 46.1% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1127 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1173 | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1108 | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1094 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1108 | — |
| LMArena French | 1109 | — |
| LMArena German | 1101 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1042 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 954 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1145 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1095 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1114 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1120 | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 7B Instruct leads
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267), Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1138 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1106 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1088 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.