Model comparison

phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 37.0 to 9.1.

Side by side

phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct specifications
phi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.738.1
Released2024-04-232025-04
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.50
Output $ / M tokens—$7.50
Results tracked1325

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads

phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—55.4%
LMArena WebDev—1275
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—41.2%
BigCodeBench Instruct37.6%—
LMArena Coding—1412
BigCodeBench Complete48.7%—
ALE-Bench—461.45
AlgoTune—1.44

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Terminal-Bench—27.2%

Reasoning Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Kagi LLM Benchmark—49.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1372
Adversarial NLI55.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard81.4%—
Epoch Capabilities Index121.23—
HellaSwag82.4%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Math—1365
MATH Level 517.6%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads

phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
GPQA Diamond27.6%—
LMArena Expert—1338
ARC (AI2) Challenge91.6%—
MMLU78%—
OpenBookQA87.4%—
TriviaQA73.9%—

Multilingual Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1346
LMArena Chinese—1357
LMArena French—1398
LMArena German—1325
LMArena Japanese—1310
LMArena Korean—1305
LMArena Russian—1366
LMArena Spanish—1360

Instruction Following Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following—1355

Long Context Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1378

Writing & Preference Not comparable

phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-medium 14BQwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
LMArena Text—1357
LMArena Creative Writing—1333
LMArena Multi-Turn—1365

Frequently asked questions

Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?

Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.1 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is phi-3-medium 14B or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?

phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper