Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 39.2 to 34.6.
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 39.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1339 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1335 |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1318 |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1308 |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1380 |
| LMArena German | — | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1327 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1310 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 has enough public results to be ranked (#160); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi-3.5-mini or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 34.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.