Model comparison
GLM-4.5V vs Phi-3.5-mini
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-4.5V leads 38.9 to 34.0.
Side by side
| GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Z.ai (Zhipu) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 39.2 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2025-08-11 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 64K | — |
| Max output | 16K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.80 | — |
| Results tracked | 15 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding GLM-4.5V leads
GLM-4.5V: 38.9 (#152), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LMArena Coding | 1347 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 26.5 (#118), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 59.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1335 | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 34.7 (#157), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1353 | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 36.8 (#155), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1353 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Multimodal Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 33.6 (#86), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1154 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 44.9 (#172), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1304 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1338 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1299 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1335 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 69.4 (#170), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1311 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 39.6 (#166), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1305 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
GLM-4.5V: 52.7 (#162), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | GLM-4.5V | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1333 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1295 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1333 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is GLM-4.5V better than Phi-3.5-mini?
GLM-4.5V has enough public results to be ranked (#158); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is GLM-4.5V or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
GLM-4.5V scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do GLM-4.5V and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. GLM-4.5V has 15 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.