Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Qwen3-1.7B
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 26.6 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2025-04-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 4 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Qwen3-1.7B: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 28.4% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 8.1% |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen3-1.7B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 38% |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Qwen3-1.7B?
Qwen3-1.7B has enough public results to be ranked (#336); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Qwen3-1.7B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-1.7B has 4.