Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Qwen Turbo
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- Phi-3.5-mini has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 27.1 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 5 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen Turbo: 15.3 (#297)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#272)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Qwen Turbo?
Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#335); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.