Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Qwen1.5-14B
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#253); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 32.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1138 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1125 |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1147 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1046 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1102 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1110 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Qwen1.5-14B has enough public results to be ranked (#253); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi-3.5-mini or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Qwen1.5-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.