Model comparison
Phi-3.5-mini vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi-3.5-mini scores higher in 1 category and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.6 to 28.8.
Side by side
| Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 36.9 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-08-16 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 5 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
Phi-3.5-mini: 34.6 (#232), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.8% | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 38.5% | 40.6% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1039 |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1028 |
| PIQA | 81% | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1089 |
| GSM8K | 86.2% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 984 |
| BoolQ | 78% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena German | — | 1006 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1004 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1023 |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 996 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi-3.5-mini: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Phi-3.5-mini | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 989 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi-3.5-mini better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#305); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is Phi-3.5-mini or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Phi-3.5-mini and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi-3.5-mini has 5 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.