Model comparison
OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi-3.5-mini
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Phi-3.5-mini leads 34.0 to 28.1.
Side by side
| OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.2 | 36.4 |
| Released | 2024-12-31 | 2024-08-16 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi-3.5-mini leads
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Phi-3.5-mini: 34.0 (#231)
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 32.8% |
| LiveBench Coding | 10.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 38.5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 16.3% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 20.6% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.1% | — |
| PIQA | — | 81% |
Math Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 15.6% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 13.6% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.2% |
Knowledge Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 31% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 31.6% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 78% |
Instruction Following Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 60.6% | — |
| IFEval | 73% | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Phi-3.5-mini: —
| Benchmark | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | Phi-3.5-mini |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | 68.9% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 11.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi-3.5-mini?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); Phi-3.5-mini does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi-3.5-mini better for coding?
Phi-3.5-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.0 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi-3.5-mini share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-mini has 5.