Model comparison

Phi-1.5 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi-1.5 Microsoft

—

Unranked

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

29.7

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

Phi-1.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct specifications
Phi-1.5Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—29.7
Released2023-09-112024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked77

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—45%
BigCodeBench Complete—52.3%

Reasoning Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Epoch Capabilities Index90.82128.52
Chess Puzzles—0%
HellaSwag47.6%—
WinoGrande73.4%—

Math Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—7.4%
MATH Level 5—56.1%

Knowledge Not comparable

Phi-1.5: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi-1.5Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—46.1%
ARC (AI2) Challenge44.4%—
BoolQ75.8%—
MMLU37.6%—
OpenBookQA37.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi-1.5 better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#291); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Phi-1.5 and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi-1.5 has 7 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper