Model comparison
Magistral Small vs Phi-1.5
Magistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#296); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Mistral AI
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
Side by side
| Magistral Small | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.2 | — |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 128K | — |
| Max output | 40K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.50 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.50 | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Magistral Small: 38.4 (#176), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Magistral Small: 6.8 (#350), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 133.19 | 91.53 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 0% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 6.3% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 5% | — |
| CritPt | 0.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 3% | — |
| DTBench | 61.3% | — |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Magistral Small: 26.2 (#261), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 30% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Magistral Small: 30.9 (#223), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Magistral Small | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Magistral Small better than Phi-1.5?
Magistral Small has enough public results to be ranked (#296); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Magistral Small and Phi-1.5 share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Magistral Small has 10 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.