Model comparison

Gemma 7B vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 7B Google

29.5

Rank #295 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 7B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.2 to 27.2.

Side by side

Gemma 7B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Gemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.542.5
Released2024-02-212025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked2725

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 29.9 (#290), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.9 (#101)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding10481441
HumanEval+28.7%—
MBPP+43.4%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 19.0 (#247), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 30.1 (#79)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10421428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%
Adversarial NLI48.7%—
BIG-Bench Hard55.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index111.74—
HellaSwag82.2%—
PIQA81.2%—
WinoGrande79%—

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 28.7 (#225), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 36.3 (#118)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math10661440
Omni-MATH—46.7%
GSM8K46.4%—

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 26.8 (#248), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.3 (#102)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert10021416
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%
ARC (AI2) Challenge78.3%—
BoolQ83.2%—
MMLU66.1%—
OpenBookQA78.6%—
TriviaQA72.3%—

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 25.3 (#282), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.3 (#88)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English9991407
LMArena Chinese10351461
LMArena French10241415
LMArena Russian9931403
LMArena German—1416
LMArena Japanese—1398
LMArena Korean—1366
LMArena Spanish—1436

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 51.7 (#290), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 71.0 (#154)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10171388
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#277), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#218)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10221403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Gemma 7B: 27.2 (#297), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.2 (#116)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 7BQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text10561417
LMArena Creative Writing10241333
LMArena Multi-Turn9631415
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 7B better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.5 to 29.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 7B or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.9 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 7B and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 7B has 27 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper