Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 47.9 to 28.4.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 42.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Palm 2: 28.5 (#306), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Palm 2: 18.2 (#270), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.0 (#67)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.79 |
Math Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Palm 2: 28.4 (#229), Qwen3.5 Plus: 47.9 (#55)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#78)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 21.1 (#290), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.3 (#291), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Plus leads
Palm 2: 30.7 (#280), Qwen3.5 Plus: 42.9 (#109)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Palm 2: 25.7 (#299), Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.3 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.