Model comparison

Palm 2 vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #67 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 62.3 to 25.6.
  • Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Palm 2 and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Palm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.046.0
Released—2026-02-01
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked1036

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Coding9941465
LMArena WebDev—1400

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Hard Prompts10051448
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
Chess Puzzles—13%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.65

Math Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Math10491454
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—88.9%

Knowledge Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond—86.4%
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision—1263

Multilingual Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English9161430
LMArena Chinese8871500
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1426
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1429
LMArena Spanish—1441

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following10101424

Long Context Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query10101442

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text10271438
LMArena Creative Writing9911401
LMArena Multi-Turn9941446
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478

Frequently asked questions

Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Palm 2 or Qwen3.5 397B-A17B better for coding?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.0 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper