Model comparison

Palm 2 vs Qwen3 235B-A22B

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.5

Rank #91 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3 235B-A22B in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 235B-A22B leads 59.6 to 25.6.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Palm 2 and Qwen3 235B-A22B specifications
Palm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.043.5
Released—2025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.70
Output $ / M tokens—$2.80
Results tracked1049

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 44.3 (#75)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Coding9941445
Aider Polyglot—59.6%
SciCode—42.4%
WeirdML—41%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.9 (#51)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—52.1%
Vending-Bench 2—-11.34

Reasoning Palm 2 leads

Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.7 (#311)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Hard Prompts10051433
ARC-AGI-2—1.3%
SimpleBench—31%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—69.4%
ARC-AGI-1—11%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Mystery Game Puzzles—9%
DTBench—80.3%
LMCA—29.3%
Epoch Capabilities Index—143.85
ForecastBench—59.7

Math Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 50.4 (#57)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Math10491432
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
Omni-MATH—71.8%
MATH Level 5—68.9%
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—8.5%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.6 (#73)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
GPQA Diamond—80.1%
SimpleQA Verified—40.4%
MMLU-Pro—84.4%
Confabulations—15.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—72.7%
LMArena Expert—1463

Multilingual Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.3 (#89)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Non-English9161409
LMArena Chinese8871481
LMArena French—1445
LMArena German—1433
LMArena Japanese—1399
LMArena Korean—1391
LMArena Russian—1411
LMArena Spanish—1430

Instruction Following Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.6 (#136)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Instruction Following10101408
IFEval—83.5%

Long Context Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#26)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Longer Query10101426
Fiction.LiveBench—75%

Writing & Preference Qwen3 235B-A22B leads

Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.6 (#108)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen3 235B-A22B
LMArena Text10271419
LMArena Creative Writing9911384
LMArena Multi-Turn9941432
Short-Story Creative Writing—83%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1366
WildBench—86.6%

Frequently asked questions

Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3 235B-A22B?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Palm 2 or Qwen3 235B-A22B better for coding?

Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3 235B-A22B share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49.

Related comparisons

Go deeper