Model comparison

Palm 2 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Palm 2 Google

30.0

Rank #298 Confirmed

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 46.7 to 25.6.
  • Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Palm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.031.9
Released—2024-09
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked1043

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Coding9941292
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10051271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Palm 2 leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Math10491283
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Not comparable

Palm 2: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond—49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English9161252
LMArena Chinese8871272
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10101254
IFEval—80.6%

Long Context Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query10101282

Writing & Preference Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPalm 2Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text10271269
LMArena Creative Writing9911221
LMArena Multi-Turn9941272
WildBench—80.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Palm 2 better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Palm 2 or Qwen2.5 72B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.2 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper