Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen1.5-7B
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-7B in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 28.5 to 20.9.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 31.4 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen1.5-7B: 32.2 (#276)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1107 |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen1.5-7B: 20.4 (#240)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1065 |
Math Too close to call
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen1.5-7B: 31.4 (#224)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1080 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen1.5-7B: 28.7 (#243)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1055 |
| MMLU | — | 62.6% |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen1.5-7B: 28.5 (#271)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1058 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1141 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1006 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen1.5-7B: 54.1 (#281)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1058 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#266)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1090 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-7B leads
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen1.5-7B: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1083 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1035 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1062 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen1.5-7B?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen1.5-7B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.2 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-7B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-7B has 13.