Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen1.5-7B leads 29.0 to 15.3.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.1 (#165)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 18.5 (#262)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 15.3 (#289)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1080 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-7B leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | — |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Qwen1.5-7B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.