Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.6 to 20.9.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1130 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1127 |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1173 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1110 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1113 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Palm 2 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.9 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.